View Single Post
Old 03-24-08, 10:46 PM   #25 (permalink)
GrumpySteelMan
Find Em Fuck Em Forget Em
 
GrumpySteelMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 982


Car 1: 2004 Nighthawk RL
Car 2: 2005 Nighthawk TL
Car 3: 2002 525i Sport Wag



iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to GrumpySteelMan
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3.5RL View Post
so what does this mean 215/40/17, they are not safe for an RL? Is it still possible to stick with 215/40/17 because the stock tires are 215/50/16.
215 is the width in milimeters, the 40 is describing sidewall height which stands for 40% of the width, 17 is the rim size in inches.

The tire you've selected is too small, in fact they'll be really goofy and rubber bandy looking. If the looks won't put you off then consider the rotational size. The stock tire is 215/50-16 and I would suggest 225/50-17 which is much closer in rotational diameter to the stock size.

The tires you selected are:

.84in SHORTER in the sidewall height
2.18in SMALLER in circumference

The 225/50-17 is:

.20in LARGER in the sidewall height

If you don't know anything about tires, even enough to know what the numbers mean, you shouldn't be second guessing the suggestions these people are offering. You also need to be sure that the tires you select have an adequate speed and load rating for safety so you don't end up with a blow-out. Saving money and dying is false economy at best. Don't save money on brakes next year either!

GSM
__________________
"A gentleman is one who never hurts anyone's feelings unintentionally." -Oscar Wilde
3.5RL With/Without Nitrous Comparo Video
GrumpySteelMan is offline   Reply With Quote