View Single Post
Old 05-10-08, 12:27 PM   #23 (permalink)
music2bmurderedby
i love the rear view
 
music2bmurderedby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: stockton, ca
Posts: 573


Car 1: 91' legend ls sedan
Car 2: 2000 odyssey van
Car 3: 96' rl



iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rower4VT View Post
So if you're gonna get personal...I think the 19's look stupid on an RL. We're talking a heavy car with a under powered V6 engine. It is not a Ferrari buddy. It is an old luxury car, that schmucks like you and I can finally afford because the old geezers that bought them finally traded them in for something more modern. I love my RL, don't get me wrong, but 19's on an RL with a little strip of rubber stretched over the wheel is "fuggin ugly". It's like a 280ZX with 18" spinners, or a Chevy Cavalier with chrome Torq-Thrust and T/A's. It just isn't right. 17's and 18's are just right for the RL. Save the 20s for the guys that like driving down the road with three 20" spinners on their car and the "spare" as the fourth, because they hit a small pot-hole and trashed a rim, and can't afford a new one...now who looks "fuggin ugly". Don't mind the sarcasm, but if you're gonna dump on someone, expect some dumpin' back.

BTW, sweet rims and clean ride. If you had to go with 19's I'd say you made a good choice.
.... uhmmmmm ..... i don't know you nor have i ever directed anything personally towards you. even my post that you are quoting & getting all butt hurt over is only trying to persuade someone to get 19's or 20's and clearly states "IMO". no i DO NOT want to get personal with you. getting personal with my wife is good enough for me. & oh yes i do agree with you on 1 thing & 1 thing only, and that is that i used the wrong word for around here - so no the 17's are not only "fuggin" ugly - they're UGLY AS "FECK" !!! and i must tell you from EXPERIENCE because it is WHAT I HAVE RODE ON for the past 10 days or so - my "rubber band" 40 series are a smoother ride than my 15's with 65 series & my 16's with 60 series. i also had absolutely no type of comparison between my 96 rl & a ferrari in my mind what soever so i don't know what the hell you were trying to conjure up with that one. & everyone else - don't forget that in this guys 1st sentence he says "i think 19's look stupid on the rl", yet then tells me "sweet rims & clean ride". 19" & 20" guys please assist in silencing this clown.
... and again "buddy" - my bad on having you quote my "fuggin ugly" remark, as the proper grammar would be FECKIN UGLY.

... EDITED PART (for everyone except rower4vt - whom already thinks hes my "buddy" & likes to get "personal" before i even acknowledge who the feck he is)... - man i aint one to judge i mean 17's or 18's look decent i guess but since getting 19's myself, i just think they look way better than 17's or 18's & i would rather go 19's or 20's if i was going to move up from anything besides the stock 16's - & that's just me - to each his/her own. i would definitely go with a good lowering though with 17's or 18's, as even my car on 19's could use a little lowering.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrumpySteelMan View Post
The Story
Ladies and Gentlemen (and music2bmurderedby),
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2005-12/1120070/sig2.jpg
COMPLETED mods...
*twin turbo kit on 35psi
*3.2 TYPE1 swap dieselized to run on cooking oil
*4 speed 86' civic tranny swap
*full quad exhaust system
*lambo doors all 4
*37,000 watt sound system
*hydraulics all the way around
*soft top convertible conversion
*auto roll down rear window & windshield
*white cloth interior
*blank cd-r hanging from rear view mirror

Last edited by music2bmurderedby : 05-10-08 at 01:44 PM.
music2bmurderedby is online now   Reply With Quote