![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Photo Gallery | Wiki | AIM Chat | DIY | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Engine & Performance Modifications
Discuss Engine and performance modifications from intake to suspension to rotors to etc. :) |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Renaissance.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tx
Posts: 2,893
|
3.5 swap questions
1) Christian, if I'm not mistaken, you're using Type II heads, whereas Diaz, you used the entire RL setup. Why did each choose the heads you chose? Advantages/disadvantages?
2) Am I to assume that the pulleys on each (3.5 vs. 3.2) block differ? 3) Both of you are using Type I ECUs, correct? No CELs? |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 2,850
|
Quote:
The advantage of the RL heads is that the manifold will bolt right up as normal. Disadvantage is the smaller intake valves (same size as Type 1) and weaker valvesprings (roughly equivalent to Type 1). The Type 2 heads have the advantage in every way, except for the rather big problem of the manifold fitting. Quote:
The best of both worlds would be reworked RL heads with Type 2 intake valves and valvetrain, along with Type 2 cams or regrinds. Not cheap I would imagine to have the headwork done to fit the larger valves. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
WHAAAAAH!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N Canton, Ohio
Posts: 10,983
Car 1: 3.5L 1991 LS Coupe 5 Spd Blk/Blk Car 2: 1994 Civic EG Hatch Car 3: 03 Honda TRX400EX iTrader: (2)
|
Quote:
The quote I got on mating the Type II valvetrain to the RL heads was $600. I really need to send my stock RL cams out for a regrind. Ken, can you look up to see why the 02-04 RL engines had more horsepower and torque than the 96-01 engines? I'm wondering if they did anything to the heads or cams to get that extra push. The Crank pulleys are totally different. I'm using a totally stock Type I ECU. The only reason I have a check engine light is because my EGR valve is blocked. I chose the entire RL setup because it was a lot easier than having the intake manifold customized, and having that water neck extended. I didn't have access to Type II heads either. Bone stock, my engine pushes 225 hp and 236 lb ft torque at the flywheel.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Get sucked in...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 4,736
Car 1: 91' 3.5lt Extreme DV8ED Hybrid 6spd Car 2: 03' G35c Blk on Blk Car 3: 92'Yukon/06'Trailer iTrader: (11)
|
Whats777,
Its like Ken said. I did the type II head route because I saw the RL heads and the internals looked different to me back then. No one had done it and someone like ken wasnt around to tell me the differences between the two. I had a chiltons book that showed valvetrain specs; the TYPE II was superior to both the RL and Type I, so I wasnt going to pay for the RL heads if i didnt need them. I had no idea that the Type II heads were going to offset my manifold, but they did and i dealt with it by widing the manifold. If i would do it again i would have reworked the RL heads to have all the TYPE II componets fit. I want every ounce of power out of my motor with the options that are redily avalible. I may still do it whenever i pull the motor again. Until Mike D dynos, we dont have a comparrison as to what the heads really do. I have a lot of dynos from when i first did the swap to now with headers and cams ect. so i would be really curious to compare Mike's progresses from stock to headers and cams. So mike, you need to dyno. ~Dv8
__________________
AEM EMS Powered. 9 yrs and counting. Results, Where are yours? 12.953@107.865MPH 95 deg. Jun. 07' 3.5 6spd-#55 jet Nitrous 316WHP@5500RPM 345Lb-ft@4100RPM NOS 06-07'N/A 234WHP@5700RPM 229lb-ft@4600RPM 06-07' 13.782@99.135MPH N/A 95 deg. Jun 07' 03' G35c Auto Vortech Supercharged pshhhh 14.3@96MPH-Stock 8 page spread Honda Tuning September 06' issue No Phone or Instant message, PM or Email only. Respect that! My Legends Website www.2slik4u.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
WHAAAAAH!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N Canton, Ohio
Posts: 10,983
Car 1: 3.5L 1991 LS Coupe 5 Spd Blk/Blk Car 2: 1994 Civic EG Hatch Car 3: 03 Honda TRX400EX iTrader: (2)
|
Quote:
I'm working on it. I need to get moving before it snows. My car doesn't know what snow (and salt) looks like.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
dealer-opted track pack
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: look behind you
Posts: 3,508
|
I caught Mike's video on Youtube the other day,
and damn that coupe has balls! The 3.5's low-end is vastly greater than the 3.2; both you and DV8 have no problem roasting tires. Ken--have you swapped yet? k.
__________________
The performance handling machine... ![]() If you've got coil-overs, corner-balance them! Please protect our environment: use a high-flow. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
WHAAAAAH!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N Canton, Ohio
Posts: 10,983
Car 1: 3.5L 1991 LS Coupe 5 Spd Blk/Blk Car 2: 1994 Civic EG Hatch Car 3: 03 Honda TRX400EX iTrader: (2)
|
Quote:
I can eat up a set of tires pretty damn quick. I can pull smoke until the middle of 3rd gear.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
WHAAAAAH!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N Canton, Ohio
Posts: 10,983
Car 1: 3.5L 1991 LS Coupe 5 Spd Blk/Blk Car 2: 1994 Civic EG Hatch Car 3: 03 Honda TRX400EX iTrader: (2)
|
Dyno results coming tonight. I finally got in at my buddy's shop. $50 for 3 runs.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
WHAAAAAH!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N Canton, Ohio
Posts: 10,983
Car 1: 3.5L 1991 LS Coupe 5 Spd Blk/Blk Car 2: 1994 Civic EG Hatch Car 3: 03 Honda TRX400EX iTrader: (2)
|
I don't have an extra O2 bung, so he said he's gonna use a sniffer at the end of my exhaust pipe.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Get sucked in...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 4,736
Car 1: 91' 3.5lt Extreme DV8ED Hybrid 6spd Car 2: 03' G35c Blk on Blk Car 3: 92'Yukon/06'Trailer iTrader: (11)
|
am i allowed to make a guess?
here goes: 1-250whp 1-250lbft ![]() no seriously 185WHP 210LBFT give or take 10 on both.... ![]() ~Dv8
__________________
AEM EMS Powered. 9 yrs and counting. Results, Where are yours? 12.953@107.865MPH 95 deg. Jun. 07' 3.5 6spd-#55 jet Nitrous 316WHP@5500RPM 345Lb-ft@4100RPM NOS 06-07'N/A 234WHP@5700RPM 229lb-ft@4600RPM 06-07' 13.782@99.135MPH N/A 95 deg. Jun 07' 03' G35c Auto Vortech Supercharged pshhhh 14.3@96MPH-Stock 8 page spread Honda Tuning September 06' issue No Phone or Instant message, PM or Email only. Respect that! My Legends Website www.2slik4u.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
WHAAAAAH!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N Canton, Ohio
Posts: 10,983
Car 1: 3.5L 1991 LS Coupe 5 Spd Blk/Blk Car 2: 1994 Civic EG Hatch Car 3: 03 Honda TRX400EX iTrader: (2)
|
From my PM to Christian:
max power = 187.64 max torque = 218.37 My air fuel ratio was between 12:1 & 13:1 the entire time. My torque curve is horrible because of the fluctuations in the air/fuel ratio. There's at least 4 major dips in the torque curve. Torque and horsepower maxed out at 5200 rpm. I have to scan the sheets at work. I have a lot to work on, that's for sure.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Renaissance.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tx
Posts: 2,893
|
1) Is the car starving for fuel at any point?
2) How steep is the drop off after 5200rpms? 3) SAFC coming? In comparing your numbers and Christian's numbers, it tells me what I needed to verify: with an RL motor, and a few mods, it is possible to have a mid 14 sec. Legend, which is my goal. Mike, I know you don't have headers. Do you have an exhaust? Any other mods besides the air intake? Last edited by whats77inaname : 11-08-06 at 09:50 PM. |
|
|
|