Acura Legend Forum Acura Legend Forum
Go Back   The Acura Legend & Acura RL Forum > Acura Legend > First Generation Legend (1986-1990)
Register Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Wiki AIM Chat DIY Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

First Generation Legend (1986-1990) Discuss the 1st Generation Honda/Acura Legend (US 8


       

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-10-03, 04:31 PM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Steveman09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sandy, OR
Posts: 1,680


Car 1: 94 Legend LS Coupe Type-II
Car 2: 87 Subaru GL10 Turbo
Car 3: 91 Eagle Talon TSI



iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Steveman09
Arrow Horsepower / Dyno Misconceptions

Ok well after a long heated debate with Turboviper (I got blocked on aim) LOL on the G1's HP output I would like to clarify some things about the differnce between the Manufactor's Ratings and the real world.





Manufactors give a Horsepower rating of 161HP for the G1 Legend with C27 Engine.



Now lots of people say "tight I have a 161hp car"


Well you do, but not really.

Let me expain :


There are 2 ways of measuring a engine's output :

Power at the Engine's Flywheel (manufactors method)

Power at the Car's Wheels (real world method)


Now when a manufactor dyno's an engine they dyno the engine out of the car on a Engine Dyno with only a flywheel on the engine. They dont install any accessories such as Alernator, Power Steering Pump, Pulleys, Belts, or Air Conditioning for testing.


So what you get is a 161hp at the flywheel

Now you put the engine in the car, attach a transmission, axels, accessories and such and such.

Now you dyno the car on a chassis dyno and you get a much smaller figure. You then wounder why this happened, well you see running accessories and transfering power through a set of gears and axels is allot of work and the engine has to do all this work on top of moving the car. This is where you LOOSE Power Output (drag on the engine)

The most loss is seen in 4WD Cars such as EVO and WRX.

They loose anywhere from 30-35% through the transmission alone.

Lots of people with EVO's were disappointed when Mistubishi said 271hp and the dyno said 190ish.

I hope this post resolved allot of misconceptions.
__________________
94 Legend LS Coupe Type-II
Steveman09 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 12-10-03, 09:00 PM   #2 (permalink)
N*gh* R*der
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NY...NC for a few Months
Posts: 239


Car 1: 89 5Speed Blue Sedan



iTrader: (0)
Damn..... Well sorry to here about the heat between two of my favorite board members. But also, I'm going into a slump of depression now. I've been living a lie, all these powerful cars really only have like under 200 horses Sigh... I've lost hope in the auto world................. **cry cry cry***


Oh well. My car still feels fast
__________________
<b><u>Goodbye to my sweet love</u></b>
<i>1989 Acura Legend: Blue 5 speed Sedan</i>

<b><u>Now own</u></b>
<i>2000 Sterlin Mist (basically Pewter) Maxima Se</i>
illlojik is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-03, 12:20 AM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Steveman09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sandy, OR
Posts: 1,680


Car 1: 94 Legend LS Coupe Type-II
Car 2: 87 Subaru GL10 Turbo
Car 3: 91 Eagle Talon TSI



iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Steveman09
Legend's still are fast, the automakers just play a number game to sell cars. The new cars like 350z, TL-S. RSX-S are still very fast cars but they dont put down near the horsepower #'s to the ground that the manufactor advertises.
__________________
94 Legend LS Coupe Type-II
Steveman09 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-03, 01:37 AM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 703


Car 1: 1987 Bahama Gold L Coupe



iTrader: (0)
Another thing to remember is horsepower sells cars, torque wins races.

What you feel in everyday driving is a lot more torque then horsepower. If you look at Steve's dyno chart in his other post you can see that the torque curve is pretty flat from about 3000 rpm's up until into the 5000's. Horsepower doesn't kick in until the engine gets moving at a higher rpm.

Standard transmissions loose about 15-20% of their horsepower at the wheels through the drivetrain, assessories etc.
Automatics loose around 20-25%, more or less depending on the torque converter and other factors.

The same would apply for torque loss as power loss.
__________________
'87 5 speed L coupe

'90 5 speed base coupe (sold)
'88 5 speed L coupe RIP (tranny) - parts car
'87 5 speed L coupe (sold)
Eric F is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-03, 10:09 AM   #5 (permalink)
1990 Legend
 
Josh S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hudson, MA
Posts: 215


Car 1: 1990 Legend Sedan/1995 Supra TT



iTrader: (0)
Yeah but if you are bench racing that all mfg's ratings are all at the crank anyway. That's always what is reported in the mag, etc. When you dyno you get the number at the wheels, which is more of a real world number. but since most car's drive train losses are similar, the car with 250hp is going to put more power to the ground than the car with 240hp.


"horsepower sells cars, torque wins races."
-Not really, then desal trucks with 600 lb/ft of TQ but only 200HP would rule, but it doesn't really work that way. It has a lot to do with gearing and being able to take advantage of the high rev HP. It might be a bit harder to get off the line with low TQ (unless you luanch it right), but overall HP is what wins races.
__________________
http://www.pelicanparts.com/MotorCit.../LegendSig.jpg

Legend - RIP 01/04
Josh S is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-03, 10:43 AM   #6 (permalink)
InksBeMe
 
GREYLEGEND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: TORONTO, CANADA
Posts: 2,043


Car 1: 89 Sedan L, 270,000 km



iTrader: (0)
The product of horsepower outputted x time is what wins races. Torque x rpm = HP. We're talking same cars here, so we won't get into power to weight ratios.

Having close ratios with multi speeds on a tranny allows us to stay close to the maximum horsepower peak at every shift so we are able to stay in the power band. A CVT transmissions is ideal because you keep the rpm where the HP is maximum and you keep varying the gear ratios to stay at that RPM as the car gains speed. Feels odd, but is effective.

Diesels pull away really quickly because their peak torque comes quickly at low rpms but it drops off quickly. They need a meag speed tranny but remember they are desgned to carry very heavy loads up hills and low speeds and not stall, so they need stump pulling torque for that.

The nice thing about the Legend is how "linear" the horsepower and how "flat" the torque curve is. That provides little flat spots and the power just seems to build as the speed increases. Like a Rotary/Wankel.
GREYLEGEND is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-03, 10:50 AM   #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
cdndvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Kelowna, BC, Canada
Posts: 274


Car 1: Dark grey 1990 L Sedan



iTrader: (0)
Josh... It really depends on how the manufacturer has designed the transmission and what the engine is like... 250 HP in a Chev (for arguments sake... I HATE Chev.) could get it's butt wiped by a 210 HP Honda. It all depends on the gearing.
__________________
1990 Legend L 5 speed sedan
17" chrome rims
Weapon R intake
Tinted windows
Pioneer stereo system
GTech Pro
Brembo cross-drilled rotors/Metalmaster pads all round
cdndvl is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-03, 12:03 PM   #8 (permalink)
1990 Legend
 
Josh S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hudson, MA
Posts: 215


Car 1: 1990 Legend Sedan/1995 Supra TT



iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by cdndvl
Josh... It really depends on how the manufacturer has designed the transmission and what the engine is like... 250 HP in a Chev (for arguments sake... I HATE Chev.) could get it's butt wiped by a 210 HP Honda. It all depends on the gearing.
I agree. I was disagreeing with the ""horsepower sells cars, torque wins races." statement made as that is not really correct.
__________________
http://www.pelicanparts.com/MotorCit.../LegendSig.jpg

Legend - RIP 01/04
Josh S is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-03, 01:08 PM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Steveman09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sandy, OR
Posts: 1,680


Car 1: 94 Legend LS Coupe Type-II
Car 2: 87 Subaru GL10 Turbo
Car 3: 91 Eagle Talon TSI



iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Steveman09
yeah there are TONS of factors that go into a race.


I've seen many many cars with less HP beat cars with more HP.


And the drivers both shifted perfectly.

3 out of 4 races the car with less HP won.

The last race the guy misshifted.


It all depends on Tranny Design, Type, Gears, Metal used in gears (weight), Axel Weight, Wheel Size and Weight............I could go on forever.
__________________
94 Legend LS Coupe Type-II
Steveman09 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-03, 09:13 PM   #10 (permalink)
twg
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 205


Car 1: 1990 Acura Legend LS Sedan



iTrader: (0)
assuming all things equal... GREYLEGEND is correct... generally HP over time is what matters.. and it's the whp that matters..

yes, for those that didnt' know, whp is less than manuf. stated hp. sticks are usually 15%, autos are 20%, depending on the car.

My other car, which is a 2000 Accord I4, stated to have 150hp... stock, dynoed, I got 133whp.. modded, I got a high of 144whp... and spraying a 75 shot.. i got 200whp..
twg is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acura Legend & Acura RL Forum > Acura Legend > First Generation Legend (1986-1990)




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2002-2006, Redline Motorsports, LLC
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.