![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Photo Gallery | Wiki | AIM Chat | DIY | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Second Generation Legend (1991-1995)
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
head gasket theory
so i was talking to a co-worker who is a skilled mechanic and former Jaguar emplyee and we were discussing why most head gaskets blow and his theory was because of the "stretchy" head bolts that acura and most car manufacturers use these days. he was saying that over time these bolts lose their strength and seal, allowing the gasket to leak. u can't re-tighten them when they are on or they will snap. and usually they arent re-useable. (correct me if i'm wrong).
So he was saying, what he has done with all of his cars that he has owned since the 60s is imeadiatly replace the head bolts with performance cold-forged bolts like ones made by ARP: http://www.arp-bolts.com/pages/produ...headstuds.html These bolts are super strong, re-useable and tighten super strong and will not lose their seal. he said that once u install these u will never have to worry about head gaskets blowing. is this true? also, i mentioned the copper head gaskets that didn't work and he was saying that in europe they use asbestos in their copper head gaskets and that seals properly, but its hard to use asbestos here because of north american laws. what are your guys thoughts on these theories? I wish I would have repalced my head bolts before my head gasket blew (would have saved me tons of money!). well, of course u have to keep up on changing the coolant as well...but thats a different story
__________________
- 1992 Isuzu Rodeo XS 4x4 - 1991 LS Sedan - SOLD http://www.imagestation.com/picture/...a/f8d4a62c.jpg |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
yah but see your head gasket blew once and then u re-torqed. in order to precent the head gasket from blowing in the first place u would have had to keep re-torqing every how ever many thousand miles. and eventually they will snap after so much torquing.
if u had the strong bolts in the head in the first place, torqed once strong, then you wouldnt have had to replace your HG and then over-torque. why do u think people have had the HG go twice or more ont hem over time? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Type I King
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,197
|
u dont have to retorque them again and again, its only a one time thing. and u dont want to torque them over 64lbs, have it arnd 60 and you shuld be fine. BTW new head bolts are PRICY
stick with stock, overtorque (after a HG job) and you should be fine. People whose heads have gone twice or so, have normally not had the job done right the first time. And you will find there are very very few people who have had it go twice on them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
It is good practice to replace critical engine fasteners on a rebuild or major repair, and the head bolts would certainly qualify as major fasteners. Overtorquing a bolt or stud can "neck" or stretch it, and it will no longer do the job it was designed to do. Going to 61 instead of 56 or whatever will probably do no harm.
Some mechanics believe it is good practice to re-torque head bolts or studs after the car has been warmed up and cooled down once or twice. Extra work, but perhaps good insurance, as some gaskets do shrink in use, and metal changes shape when heated and cooled. Having said that, I still think the main causes of HG problems with our cars are: 1. Failure to change coolant regularly (leads to corrosion), and 2. Overheating, due to rad/hose failure, or air in the cooling system.
__________________
92 LS Coupe 83,000 Miles & Counting Stock except -GS RIMS -Clear Bumpers |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
WHAAAAAH!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N Canton, Ohio
Posts: 10,983
Car 1: 3.5L 1991 LS Coupe 5 Spd Blk/Blk Car 2: 1994 Civic EG Hatch Car 3: 03 Honda TRX400EX iTrader: (2)
|
Here's my theory that I discussed with a long time Acura tech. There's a few reasons why the Legend engine blows head gaskets.
Theory #1. The Vibration effect - once you remove the heads, you'll notice that the cyilnder walls sit out in the open by themselves with the coolant jacket surrounding it. No structural support at the top of the cylinder walls. What we discussed was the fact that engines vibrate, and the vibration eventually eats away at the gasket allowing coolant to flow into the cylinder. Typically it does this more at the rear of the engine (#3 and #6 cylinders). Next time you're in your car, rev it up to about 1500-2000 RPM's and feel the vibration that I'm talking about. Think about that vibration happening for 100k-150k miles and how that affects this area of the engine. Theory #2. Improperly torqued heads - We talked a little about overtorquing heads and he claims that he overtorques the C32a heads to 59-60 lb ft. The theory is that when the engines were built at the factory, the engineers of the C series engines underestimated the torque specs for the heads. The factory torque spec should have probably been 60-62 lb. ft. Theory #3. Non-Honda coolant - Basically any non-Honda coolant can cause deterioration of the head gasket. See this post for more info: Why you should use Honda Brand Antifreeze
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
WHAAAAAH!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N Canton, Ohio
Posts: 10,983
Car 1: 3.5L 1991 LS Coupe 5 Spd Blk/Blk Car 2: 1994 Civic EG Hatch Car 3: 03 Honda TRX400EX iTrader: (2)
|
Quote:
I overheated the crap out my 92 sedan one day and to this day the guy that bought it doesn't have any head gasket problems. Making me think that not all the engines have this problem
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
I think to do this, you'd have to drain all the coolant, then release the bolts, then re-torque them in the proper sequence. I think I'd stay away from this, as I think it could lead to all sorts of problems.
__________________
92 LS Coupe 83,000 Miles & Counting Stock except -GS RIMS -Clear Bumpers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
I also agree with some heads not being torqued correctly from the factory..... The one reason I cannot fully accept in the "Honda" coolant thing..... I have read all the links and stuff..... I am not saying no..... but I find it hard to believe.
__________________
Troy 67 Pontiac GTO 400 4Speed 00 Chevy Silverado 4x4 Z71 95 Acura Legend L Sedan 5 Speed - SOLD TMG1065@optonline.net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
so no one thinks that my idea of using non-stretch bolts liek the APR ones would help anything?
__________________
- 1992 Isuzu Rodeo XS 4x4 - 1991 LS Sedan - SOLD http://www.imagestation.com/picture/...a/f8d4a62c.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | ||
|
WHAAAAAH!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N Canton, Ohio
Posts: 10,983
Car 1: 3.5L 1991 LS Coupe 5 Spd Blk/Blk Car 2: 1994 Civic EG Hatch Car 3: 03 Honda TRX400EX iTrader: (2)
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Interesting. Now what I'm curious about is whether other manufacturers use similar designs, and if so, whether they have problems with head sealing at the cylinders. Any more info on this?
__________________
92 LS Coupe 83,000 Miles & Counting Stock except -GS RIMS -Clear Bumpers |
|
|
|
|
|