Acura Legend Forum Acura Legend Forum
Go Back   The Acura Legend & Acura RL Forum > Acura RL > Second Generation RL (2005)
Register Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Wiki AIM Chat DIY Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Second Generation RL (2005)


       

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-21-08, 08:15 PM   #61 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Artillery129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 1,570


Car 1: 95 Acura Legend



iTrader: (0)
I feel ya, i think we should send some letter or something to acura, like i seriously just had the desire to mail them a letter in japan, make some sort of petition you know idk..
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boondock Saint View Post
change your user name to: Pimpmyride. why your ask? because you always put the most random shit in your car.
Quote:
Originally Posted by redac93 View Post
WOW!!!!SO WHAT NEXT A POPCORN MAKER IN THE TRUNK


Chromed Grill, Seven X Wheels, Clear Corners, Spoiler, Custom Bumper, Exhaust tips (Woo Woo!) Fog Lights, Garage Door Opener Mod, Repainted Head Unit, Fog Machine, Short Ram K&N, UnderCarriage Lights, Sylvania SilverLights Headlights
Artillery129 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 02-22-08, 08:34 PM   #62 (permalink)
VIP Premium Member
 
VIP Legend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Saint Barbara, CA
Posts: 423


Car 1: Legend Coupe



iTrader: (1)
People want a V8 for that price. It doesn't matter how "high-tech" or advanced the RL V6 is. It lacks torque. People in the market for a luxury sedan want the torque available from low rpms, without having to rev all day (comparatively). Also, as people mentioned, for that amount of money people want to make a statement. Even if that statement is, look at me, I drive a Mercedes like everyone else and their mother. The new RL is somewhat of a flop and I could have told you that before it was ever released. Many, many people would rather have RWD (the standard performance configuration) than a gimmicky AWD system that is guilty of taking acronyms to new heights. Additionally, the RL is very generic looking. It might be a nice looking car but its definitely not a benchmark of car design (like the G2 Legend was).
__________________
FS:

OEM G1 LEGEND Climate Control Unit

WTB:

OEM '90 Legend Coupe Door Lock Knob (Black)
VIP Legend is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-08, 09:50 PM   #63 (permalink)
B+O
The Avatar
 
B+O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: somewhere
Posts: 11,914


Car 1: why?



iTrader: (1)
Send a message via AIM to B+O
Quote:
Originally Posted by VIP Legend View Post
People want a V8 for that price. It doesn't matter how "high-tech" or advanced the RL V6 is. It lacks torque. People in the market for a luxury sedan want the torque available from low rpms, without having to rev all day (comparatively). Also, as people mentioned, for that amount of money people want to make a statement. Even if that statement is, look at me, I drive a Mercedes like everyone else and their mother. The new RL is somewhat of a flop and I could have told you that before it was ever released. Many, many people would rather have RWD (the standard performance configuration) than a gimmicky AWD system that is guilty of taking acronyms to new heights. Additionally, the RL is very generic looking. It might be a nice looking car but its definitely not a benchmark of car design (like the G2 Legend was).
That's funny you'd think that since the majority of people who buy these cars are women and they generally have a negative view of Rear Wheel Drive from a safety standpoint. That is unless a male bought the car for them, and even then, if they bought the car it's not the driveline configuration that sold the car to the wife. It's the panache and "cuteness".

Have you researched the demographic of the people who buy these cars?

Just as an Aside...

The city where the RL debuted is one of the most popular areas of its sale, the hype that was out there really helped it along. I see them all the time in the DMV area (DC/Maryland/Virginia).

Last edited by B+O : 02-22-08 at 09:59 PM.
B+O is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-08, 12:50 PM   #64 (permalink)
Moderator
 
hnic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,067


Car 1: 2004 Acura 3.5RL
Car 2: 1998 Acura 3.5RL



iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to hnic
The RL doesn't sell because its a big, steaming pile of sugar honey iced tea.



I'm sure Acura knows that they weren't/aren't going to sell many RLs. They know their bread and butter lies in the TL/TSX/MDX sales. As far as I'm concerned they are doing okay with the car, but they could do more to establish the RL as a car they actually intend to sell instead of being okay with it's seemingly halo car-like status.

I'm keeping my eyes peeled for a V8 option (long shot) or a car that will sit above the RL and assume flagship status allowing the RL to better compete with the GS/E class/5 series/M.

Although, if Acura releases a big luxo barge...a V8 would seem like a foregone conclusion.
__________________
Will all ugly people please be quiet!?

LS430 is coming
hnic is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-08, 02:30 PM   #65 (permalink)
93 LEGEND LS 3.5L
 
divinchi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bronx, NYC
Posts: 431


Car 1: 93' Metalic Gold LS 3.5L Sedan
Car 2: 95' Red LS Coupe



iTrader: (4)
Send a message via AIM to divinchi Send a message via Yahoo to divinchi
Size matters, Looks Matter, Honda Like...NO!

Well, I know for me was the size of the car and even more the fact that it looks like a Honda when it should look like an Acura. I look at the new Lexus and the new BMW’s and see that they are large and roomy and very beautiful, they look beautiful and very pleasing to the eye. It is so small and not of my taste, I loved the look of the first generation RL’s, they were roomy and very comfortable looking. For me, when I am going to buy a car, I look at the size of the car first before anything, but that is just me…. I look at the new RL’s and see only Honda which I believe someone already said that on this thread.

But that is just my 2 cents…. If I want a Honda, I will buy a Honda; I am not going to buy a car that looks like a Honda…

Acura need’s to focus on the girth of the car, match it up against the GS Lexus or 7 series BMW’s…
__________________
SR5GUY Chipped
3.5L
PIONEER AVIC-D3/REMOTE, BLUETOOTH/IPOD ADAPTER
Type 2 Tranny and TCU, Type 2 Calipers
Koni Red's Front and Rear
Secret Weapon R Intake W/Cold Air Box
MTX 5 Channel AMP/Kenwood Mono 600 Watt Amp
Infinity Kappa’s Front and Rear
12 Inch L5 Solo-Baric
Hirschmann 2040 Automatic-Antenna
8000K H.I.D's/Fog Lights By Mac
Cross Drilled/Slotted Rotors
JDM AC Control Unit
divinchi is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-08, 10:32 PM   #66 (permalink)
Moderator
 
hnic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,067


Car 1: 2004 Acura 3.5RL
Car 2: 1998 Acura 3.5RL



iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to hnic
once again...

everyone seems to want to cross-shop the RL with RWD V8 powered ultra-luxury sedans that are not in its class.

The RL doesnt need to be any bigger than what it is as it is similar in size to the GS and the 5.

It seems to me that most of the people in this thread want the RL to be something that it's not.
__________________
Will all ugly people please be quiet!?

LS430 is coming
hnic is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-08, 11:04 PM   #67 (permalink)
Registered User
 
CDUBB1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: BK NEW YORK
Posts: 344


Car 1: 1995 TAN SEDAN 50k ....SOLD
Car 2: MTA
Car 3: lil hooptie



iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to CDUBB1
Quote:
Originally Posted by hnic View Post
once again...

everyone seems to want to cross-shop the RL with RWD V8 powered ultra-luxury sedans that are not in its class.

The RL doesnt need to be any bigger than what it is as it is similar in size to the GS and the 5.

It seems to me that most of the people in this thread want the RL to be something that it's not.
Your right, I think that we expect that because they use the word ''Flagship". When you hear that word you think of large, V8, RWD vehicles. And the price the ask is in the "Flagship" territory.
CDUBB1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-08, 11:11 PM   #68 (permalink)
B+O
The Avatar
 
B+O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: somewhere
Posts: 11,914


Car 1: why?



iTrader: (1)
Send a message via AIM to B+O
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDUBB1 View Post
Your right, I think that we expect that because they use the word ''Flagship". When you hear that word you think of large, V8, RWD vehicles. And the price the ask is in the "Flagship" territory.
I thnk that's the problem...we all don't think like that.

I hear Flagship, i think "top line sedan"

If you say Saturn Flagship....I think "Aura"

If you say Dodge Flagship, i think Charger

If you say Hyundai Flagship, i think Azera

If you say Volvo Flagship, I think S80

Every company has a flagship...Not every company has a Q-ship.

Lexus' Flagship is the LSwhatever, Mercedes is the S-class, BMW has the 7 series, Audi the A8, Honda the Accord, Toyota the Avalon, etc.


The Flagship is the car that sells the least amount of units, unless it's a bargain basement brand. A Low line marque that has trash cars except the top line model.

The Nissan Maxima doesn't sell big units, but it's the flagship of nissan.

Last edited by B+O : 02-27-08 at 11:18 PM.
B+O is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-08, 11:20 PM   #69 (permalink)
B+O
The Avatar
 
B+O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: somewhere
Posts: 11,914


Car 1: why?



iTrader: (1)
Send a message via AIM to B+O
Also,The price they ask is FAR from the "flagship" territory you speak of...

Again, i STILL don't think you've researched the cars you're comparing it to.

You're comparing it to the Sclass, the 7 series the A8, things of that nature...well how about this...i'm going to put together a nice little list of MSRPs for you so you can stop with that nonsense.
B+O is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-08, 11:27 PM   #70 (permalink)
Registered User
 
CDUBB1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: BK NEW YORK
Posts: 344


Car 1: 1995 TAN SEDAN 50k ....SOLD
Car 2: MTA
Car 3: lil hooptie



iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to CDUBB1
Quote:
Originally Posted by B+O View Post
Also,The price they ask is FAR from the "flagship" territory you speak of...

Again, i STILL don't think you've researched the cars you're comparing it to.

You're comparing it to the Sclass, the 7 series the A8, things of that nature...well how about this...i'm going to put together a nice little list of MSRPs for you so you can stop with that nonsense.
well u might be right but the sales speak for itself. People obviously dont think its good enough for the price they are asking for it.
CDUBB1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-08, 11:53 PM   #71 (permalink)
L E G E N D
 
FutureX 2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Montebello, CA
Posts: 4,210


Car 1: '95 Coupe
Car 2: '94 Sedan GS
Car 3: '90 Coupe



iTrader: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to FutureX 2001 Send a message via AIM to FutureX 2001 Send a message via MSN to FutureX 2001
Just my .02. I like the features on the RL, but I find it's styling extremely bland, and just unattractive.
__________________
FutureX 2001 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-08, 02:11 AM   #72 (permalink)
Eh...What up Doc
 
Xcaliber003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,227


Car 1: 1989 Acura Legend LS 4Dr



iTrader: (0)
I think one problem other than advertising (finally saw an RL ad in a mag) is the image of the overall design.

The most successful mid-sized luxury sport sedans have a "stately" somewhat lengthy presence(not too long but enough to look "powerful"). One part of this "presence" is a long hoodlid. I know this is sounding left field but I'm getting to a point.

The first gen RL 'specially the 02-04 had longer more "stately" front ends. Their front ends were long and the front overhang was short, giving it a more luxurious, pricey, luxo car image. As we already know this mostly was due to the longitudinal engine layout, which helps put the motor behind the front axle and push the front wheels closer to the front corners.

But when the sec gen RL came out it had a tranversely mounted engine, which lead to the usual long "economy car" front overhang. If this wasn't enough to hurt the luxo car image they also added a cab forward windshield design. Similar to the ones on the Intrepids and things. This plus the long front overhang makes the front end look like a big Neon. No matter what they do to the design of the car if it continues to have a tranversely mounted motor and a cab forward design it will ALWAYS look like a large common bread and butter car(long NEON).

One perfect example even though it's not in the same class as the RL is Intrepid vs the 300C. Both are big ass cars, but the 300C has a different outline without cab forward design and a short hoodlid. Which car looks more "stately"?
__________________
"love em all,trust a few,and fear none". . .Mos Def


"Don't look at your car as it is now, see it the way it'll be when you're done fixin it up."
Xcaliber003 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-08, 02:20 AM   #73 (permalink)
Iz not post whore. U iz
 
BUSINESSMAN07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,964



iTrader: (1)
The RL loses bcuase its the fat jock everyone knows but no one talks to even though he is a star athlete.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by DandDEE View Post
you should teach her to make u some eggs like "bitch make me some eggs" ...
BUSINESSMAN07 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-08, 08:48 AM   #74 (permalink)
B+O
The Avatar
 
B+O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: somewhere
Posts: 11,914


Car 1: why?



iTrader: (1)
Send a message via AIM to B+O
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xcaliber003 View Post
I think one problem other than advertising (finally saw an RL ad in a mag) is the image of the overall design.

The most successful mid-sized luxury sport sedans have a "stately" somewhat lengthy presence(not too long but enough to look "powerful"). One part of this "presence" is a long hoodlid. I know this is sounding left field but I'm getting to a point.

The first gen RL 'specially the 02-04 had longer more "stately" front ends. Their front ends were long and the front overhang was short, giving it a more luxurious, pricey, luxo car image. As we already know this mostly was due to the longitudinal engine layout, which helps put the motor behind the front axle and push the front wheels closer to the front corners.

But when the sec gen RL came out it had a tranversely mounted engine, which lead to the usual long "economy car" front overhang. If this wasn't enough to hurt the luxo car image they also added a cab forward windshield design. Similar to the ones on the Intrepids and things. This plus the long front overhang makes the front end look like a big Neon. No matter what they do to the design of the car if it continues to have a tranversely mounted motor and a cab forward design it will ALWAYS look like a large common bread and butter car(long NEON).

One perfect example even though it's not in the same class as the RL is Intrepid vs the 300C. Both are big ass cars, but the 300C has a different outline without cab forward design and a short hoodlid. Which car looks more "stately"?
I completely agree. I said something about the fact that it's the engine placement...
Quote:
Originally Posted by B+O
Now if people are clamoring for RWD for the simple shape of the car, i can understand
I believe that the longitudinal engine placement is key in the design of a car that is supposed to exude class and presence. it goes back to Custom Coach Works of the twenties and 30s. loonnnng hoods with short little cabs at the back, non existant overhangs with a seemingly lower rear end, and short decklid. The Legend and RL pulled this look off, long front short front overhang, short rear deck, tall greenhouse.

The classic proportions of a luxury car.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BUSINESSMAN07 View Post
The RL loses bcuase its the fat jock everyone knows but no one talks to even though he is a star athlete.
I can buy that
B+O is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-08, 03:36 PM   #75 (permalink)
JDM FREAK
 
qatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 115


Car 1: 2005 Acura RL
Car 2: 2006 Honda Accord



iTrader: (0)
The solution for Acura to come out of that hole has more to it than designing a new car above the RL, one car cannot help the brand.
The answe is the brand's image as whole. First get rid of all the FWD and change them to AWD, Acura's should not have more than %10 of thier cars as FWD. The RL should be stretched out a bit by a margin from the Accord/TL territory.
If you look at any claimed luxury brand, you wont find more than one car with FWD, and they provide a variety of set ups. Ala, Lexus ES, Audi A4.
If Honda caught up tp Acura in terms of horsepower and features, then Acura should pull ahead by AWD and more torque.
in addition, Acura should provide manufacture installed options/accessories and stop thier petty dealer installations.
One more thing, whatever you provide the Japanese market and Canadian market, should be offered in all markets, even as options, and the same goes for the other markets as well
qatar is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acura Legend & Acura RL Forum > Acura RL > Second Generation RL (2005)