![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Photo Gallery | Wiki | AIM Chat | DIY | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Second Generation RL (2005) |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#61 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
I feel ya, i think we should send some letter or something to acura, like i seriously just had the desire to mail them a letter in japan, make some sort of petition you know idk..
__________________
Quote:
Chromed Grill, Seven X Wheels, Clear Corners, Spoiler, Custom Bumper, Exhaust tips (Woo Woo!) Fog Lights, Garage Door Opener Mod, Repainted Head Unit, Fog Machine, Short Ram K&N, UnderCarriage Lights, Sylvania SilverLights Headlights |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#62 (permalink) |
|
VIP Premium Member
|
People want a V8 for that price. It doesn't matter how "high-tech" or advanced the RL V6 is. It lacks torque. People in the market for a luxury sedan want the torque available from low rpms, without having to rev all day (comparatively). Also, as people mentioned, for that amount of money people want to make a statement. Even if that statement is, look at me, I drive a Mercedes like everyone else and their mother. The new RL is somewhat of a flop and I could have told you that before it was ever released. Many, many people would rather have RWD (the standard performance configuration) than a gimmicky AWD system that is guilty of taking acronyms to new heights. Additionally, the RL is very generic looking. It might be a nice looking car but its definitely not a benchmark of car design (like the G2 Legend was).
__________________
FS: OEM G1 LEGEND Climate Control Unit WTB: OEM '90 Legend Coupe Door Lock Knob (Black) |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 (permalink) | |
|
The Avatar
|
Quote:
Have you researched the demographic of the people who buy these cars? Just as an Aside... The city where the RL debuted is one of the most popular areas of its sale, the hype that was out there really helped it along. I see them all the time in the DMV area (DC/Maryland/Virginia). Last edited by B+O : 02-22-08 at 09:59 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,067
|
The RL doesn't sell because its a big, steaming pile of sugar honey iced tea.
I'm sure Acura knows that they weren't/aren't going to sell many RLs. They know their bread and butter lies in the TL/TSX/MDX sales. As far as I'm concerned they are doing okay with the car, but they could do more to establish the RL as a car they actually intend to sell instead of being okay with it's seemingly halo car-like status. I'm keeping my eyes peeled for a V8 option (long shot) or a car that will sit above the RL and assume flagship status allowing the RL to better compete with the GS/E class/5 series/M. Although, if Acura releases a big luxo barge...a V8 would seem like a foregone conclusion.
__________________
Will all ugly people please be quiet!? LS430 is coming |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 (permalink) |
|
93 LEGEND LS 3.5L
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bronx, NYC
Posts: 431
|
Size matters, Looks Matter, Honda Like...NO!
Well, I know for me was the size of the car and even more the fact that it looks like a Honda when it should look like an Acura. I look at the new Lexus and the new BMW’s and see that they are large and roomy and very beautiful, they look beautiful and very pleasing to the eye. It is so small and not of my taste, I loved the look of the first generation RL’s, they were roomy and very comfortable looking. For me, when I am going to buy a car, I look at the size of the car first before anything, but that is just me…. I look at the new RL’s and see only Honda which I believe someone already said that on this thread.
But that is just my 2 cents…. If I want a Honda, I will buy a Honda; I am not going to buy a car that looks like a Honda… Acura need’s to focus on the girth of the car, match it up against the GS Lexus or 7 series BMW’s…
__________________
SR5GUY Chipped 3.5L PIONEER AVIC-D3/REMOTE, BLUETOOTH/IPOD ADAPTER Type 2 Tranny and TCU, Type 2 Calipers Koni Red's Front and Rear Secret Weapon R Intake W/Cold Air Box MTX 5 Channel AMP/Kenwood Mono 600 Watt Amp Infinity Kappa’s Front and Rear 12 Inch L5 Solo-Baric Hirschmann 2040 Automatic-Antenna 8000K H.I.D's/Fog Lights By Mac Cross Drilled/Slotted Rotors JDM AC Control Unit |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,067
|
once again...
everyone seems to want to cross-shop the RL with RWD V8 powered ultra-luxury sedans that are not in its class. The RL doesnt need to be any bigger than what it is as it is similar in size to the GS and the 5. It seems to me that most of the people in this thread want the RL to be something that it's not.
__________________
Will all ugly people please be quiet!? LS430 is coming |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: BK NEW YORK
Posts: 344
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 (permalink) | |
|
The Avatar
|
Quote:
I hear Flagship, i think "top line sedan" If you say Saturn Flagship....I think "Aura" If you say Dodge Flagship, i think Charger If you say Hyundai Flagship, i think Azera If you say Volvo Flagship, I think S80 Every company has a flagship...Not every company has a Q-ship. Lexus' Flagship is the LSwhatever, Mercedes is the S-class, BMW has the 7 series, Audi the A8, Honda the Accord, Toyota the Avalon, etc. The Flagship is the car that sells the least amount of units, unless it's a bargain basement brand. A Low line marque that has trash cars except the top line model. The Nissan Maxima doesn't sell big units, but it's the flagship of nissan. Last edited by B+O : 02-27-08 at 11:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 (permalink) |
|
The Avatar
|
Also,The price they ask is FAR from the "flagship" territory you speak of...
Again, i STILL don't think you've researched the cars you're comparing it to. You're comparing it to the Sclass, the 7 series the A8, things of that nature...well how about this...i'm going to put together a nice little list of MSRPs for you so you can stop with that nonsense. |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: BK NEW YORK
Posts: 344
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 (permalink) |
|
Eh...What up Doc
|
I think one problem other than advertising (finally saw an RL ad in a mag) is the image of the overall design.
The most successful mid-sized luxury sport sedans have a "stately" somewhat lengthy presence(not too long but enough to look "powerful"). One part of this "presence" is a long hoodlid. I know this is sounding left field but I'm getting to a point. The first gen RL 'specially the 02-04 had longer more "stately" front ends. Their front ends were long and the front overhang was short, giving it a more luxurious, pricey, luxo car image. As we already know this mostly was due to the longitudinal engine layout, which helps put the motor behind the front axle and push the front wheels closer to the front corners. But when the sec gen RL came out it had a tranversely mounted engine, which lead to the usual long "economy car" front overhang. If this wasn't enough to hurt the luxo car image they also added a cab forward windshield design. Similar to the ones on the Intrepids and things. This plus the long front overhang makes the front end look like a big Neon. No matter what they do to the design of the car if it continues to have a tranversely mounted motor and a cab forward design it will ALWAYS look like a large common bread and butter car(long NEON). One perfect example even though it's not in the same class as the RL is Intrepid vs the 300C. Both are big ass cars, but the 300C has a different outline without cab forward design and a short hoodlid. Which car looks more "stately"?
__________________
"love em all,trust a few,and fear none". . .Mos Def "Don't look at your car as it is now, see it the way it'll be when you're done fixin it up." |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 (permalink) | |||
|
The Avatar
|
Quote:
Quote:
The classic proportions of a luxury car. Quote:
I can buy that |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#75 (permalink) |
|
JDM FREAK
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 115
|
The solution for Acura to come out of that hole has more to it than designing a new car above the RL, one car cannot help the brand.
The answe is the brand's image as whole. First get rid of all the FWD and change them to AWD, Acura's should not have more than %10 of thier cars as FWD. The RL should be stretched out a bit by a margin from the Accord/TL territory. If you look at any claimed luxury brand, you wont find more than one car with FWD, and they provide a variety of set ups. Ala, Lexus ES, Audi A4. If Honda caught up tp Acura in terms of horsepower and features, then Acura should pull ahead by AWD and more torque. in addition, Acura should provide manufacture installed options/accessories and stop thier petty dealer installations. One more thing, whatever you provide the Japanese market and Canadian market, should be offered in all markets, even as options, and the same goes for the other markets as well |
|
|
|