I am in the market for a car for my daughter - she has a son and my priorities are safety, reliability and value.
A very close friend has offered me his father's 1999 RL 3.5 for $10,000 - which is at least $500 - $1000 below wholesale. The car has 51,000 miles on it and appears to be in excellent condition. Recently had new brakes, master cylinder and tires.
If I didn't purchase this car, the alternatives for her would be something like:
- 2004 Malibu LS 6 cyl 30k miles - ~$12000
- 2003 Impala 6 cyl 30k miles - ~$13000
- 2004 LeSabre 6 cyl 30k miles - ~$14500
It seems clear to me that the Acura is a better value, is a better car (tho 4 - 5 years older) and would hold the value better.
My question is whether the age of the car would outweigh those benefits in terms of more maintenance and higher costs of maintenance??
My friend is happy for me to take the car and drive it for a day or two and have my mechanic look over it.
Your opinions would be appreciated! I also own a Mazda RX8 and have benefited from a similar forum at the rx8club.com
Thanks!
A very close friend has offered me his father's 1999 RL 3.5 for $10,000 - which is at least $500 - $1000 below wholesale. The car has 51,000 miles on it and appears to be in excellent condition. Recently had new brakes, master cylinder and tires.
If I didn't purchase this car, the alternatives for her would be something like:
- 2004 Malibu LS 6 cyl 30k miles - ~$12000
- 2003 Impala 6 cyl 30k miles - ~$13000
- 2004 LeSabre 6 cyl 30k miles - ~$14500
It seems clear to me that the Acura is a better value, is a better car (tho 4 - 5 years older) and would hold the value better.
My question is whether the age of the car would outweigh those benefits in terms of more maintenance and higher costs of maintenance??
My friend is happy for me to take the car and drive it for a day or two and have my mechanic look over it.
Your opinions would be appreciated! I also own a Mazda RX8 and have benefited from a similar forum at the rx8club.com
Thanks!