Acura Legend Forum banner
781 - 800 of 1,017 Posts
khoerling said:
Shoot another video if possible ;)
k.
Seconded!
Hey C, why is it that bottle showed 15% increase and n/a is ~ 7%?
Anyway like Cole said, 300whp is bad a**!
 
LS92Sedan said:
the nitrous is why it showed 15% increase, the nitrous allows him to burn more fuel more efficiently, plus with the cams and port work his air charge is much much better than without the cams, he can utilize the flow to hsi advantage, great #'s DV8
Ohh, aiight! Thanks for the explanation bro! :)
 
kotetu said:
If you factor in 17-20% drivetrain loss, that's between 275 and 285 HP at the crank. :) Torque would be around 270-280 as well. Nice NSX killer you got there!
Actually Kotetu, you may be right. At this point DV8 can probably run a very close quarter mile against an NSX while spraying. Only reason it would be close is the difference in weight.

DV8, do you ever plan on going further into the weight reduction side of things?
 
Mikey851 said:
Actually Kotetu, you may be right. At this point DV8 can probably run a very close quarter mile against an NSX while spraying. Only reason it would be close is the difference in weight.
I would think he could beat a stock 270 hp (3.0L) NSX in the 1/4 pretty easily with nitrous now. He should be in the low, low 14's N/A, ought to break into the 12's on nitrous if he can get traction, etc.

Congrats on the numbers Christian. Looks like the cams worked great for you, I bet the headers are really coming into play now. Can't wait to see the dyno chart, I want to see what the high rpm curve looks like!
 
Discussion starter · #790 ·
OK. let me get to the details now.

Let me preface by telling everyone that we, including myself dont know shit about this engine, even if some of us know more than others.

At first(when i first did the 3.5) i thought I would have more HP than TQ, because i was using the TYPE II heads, wrong. Cant blame myself for thinking that way, its only natural to think HP over TQ.

No mods I have done since would increase HP over TQ. Mod after mod after mod. Dyno after dyno, more TQ than HP. Cool and all but in a FWD setup it kind of sucks. Just as i'm getting used to the whole reversal of power. These Web Camshafts change everything!
Now im making more HP than TQ and in some cases equal power. MY TQ and HP wasnt seperated by a few ponies we're talking 12-15 difference. Well guess what folks? I dynoed 212WHP in Jan 06' now i peaked out at 228, hows that for a gain?

Kenso, looks as though these cams were indeed the ticket for the 3.5. I actually lost TQ lower but gain it in HP just like i wanted. Crazy to think that the 3.2 reacts so differently to the same mods.

Alright, on to nitrous. It was a go big or go home senario for me. I havent shot Nitrous since July of 04' and that was the last time on the dyno. I havent shot Nitrous since 03' on the track. Since everything was working good, i had the AFC and Wideband set to monitor what went on. I threw in a 55 jet. Yea thats huge! I really dont know what #shot that is but its big. It didnt even reach 3500RPM and it maxed out the injectors and a CEL came on. No worries the car was fine we got off before the A/F wnt to lean. That run was already making 312LBFT at 2800RPM. Of course the HP didnt paint because that comes around 5k.

Moving to a .49 jet gave us the 300WHP and 309LBFT all the way through the RPMS. Great numbers but really not usable because, as i stated before in countless other threads, the ECU was fighting us. It couldnt figure out what to do in the low RPMs with the timing under the Nitrous load. After it figured it out thats where it skyrockets. In the real world the peaks and valleys accociated with the timing advancing and retarding on the dyno graph wouldnt translate well on the strip. You can see peaks and valleys +/- 50WTQ & similar WHP!

We decided to scale it down some more. I tried 47, 45 and 42 jets. Offering the safest A/F and didnt max out the injectors was the #42 jet. the power wasnt to shabby either 280WHP and 280WTQ. The peaks and valleys were decent and deffenitly street useable.

Dynos:

N/A and Good Nitrous shot#42 jet
Image


Bigger nitrous shot #49 jet
Image


Ask away....

~Dv8
 
On the #42 jet it looks to be pretty smooth; almost an ideal powercurve for drag strip use.

You're definately right, management is your next needed mod.
 
Discussion starter · #792 ·
Mikey851 said:
On the #42 jet it looks to be pretty smooth; almost an ideal powercurve for drag strip use.

You're definately right, management is your next needed mod.
Told you so :p :)
 
wow that’s insane the different displacements showed different results with the cams. I remember you always had more tq than hp and you always said that you just had to deal with it haha I'm glad to see you can now manage that. You are the most individual researcher of these
engines I have ever seen, great job man you set level for everybody else to compete against.

haha I'm a little drunk by the way
 
Cole, I'm willing to bet it's not the different displacement that produces these different numbers, it's where that displacement comes from. I'm sure you know that the C35 has a greater stroke than the C32 by 5 mm. This greater stroke provides increased rod angularity, and it is always bound to create more torque. Another byproduct of this added stroke is the effect on a cylinders ability to pump air into the cylinder. It gives it the ability to suck air into the cylinder with extreme efficiency at low rpm but at high rpm it hinders this ability. Therefore, DV8's cam increased lift and duration, which made up for this difference in the C32 and C35 which in essence allowed it to "breathe" better at or around the powerband, consequently shifted the torque curve to match. That led to a more equal production of power. It's hard to explain like this but you've seen it now first hand, so it sort of explained itself.
 
Discussion starter · #797 ·
kotetu said:
DV8, do you have the specs of the cams that were made for you, or if we want them made do we just say "I want the DV8 spec cams for G2 Legends."?

:D
Grind number is 543 for the intake and 410 for the exhaust if anyone is interested in having a set of their own. You will have to send your stock in. These numbers are off stock TYPE II cams and modified TYPE II cams. So RL and TYPE I need not apply.

Stock:

Intake cam lift:249
Duration @50 212

Exhaust cam lift:233
duration @50 209

Web Cam Regrind:

Intake cam lift:252
Duration @50 218

Exhaust cam lift:242
duration @50 216
 
Discussion starter · #798 · (Edited)
Here is the break down from Jan 06' dyno vs. May 06' dyno

RPM
Old dyno-new dyno= results

N/A WHP

3k
109-100= -9
3.5k
134-125= -9
4k
162-154= -8
4.5k
189-186= -3
5k
204-208= +4
5.5k
212-223= +11
6k
200-224= +24
6.5k
192-218 = +26

Ave. loss = -7.25
Ave. gain = +16.25

N/A WTQ

3k
193-176= -17
3.5k
200-186= -16
4k
214-202= -12
4.5
221-220= -1
5k
215-218= +3
5.5k
204-211= +7
6k
175-198= +23
6.5
154-176= +22

Ave. loss= -11.5
Ave. gain= +13.75





~Dv8
 
Dv8 said:
Here is the break down from Jan 06' dyno vs. May 06' dyno

RPM
Old dyno-new dyno= results

N/A WHP

3k
109-100= -9
3.5k
134-125= -9
4k
162-154= -8
4.5k
189-186= -3
5k
204-208= +4
5.5k
212-223= +11
6k
200-224= +24
6.5k
192-218 = +26

Ave. loss = -7.25
Ave. gain = +16.25

N/A WTQ

3k
193-176= -17
3.5k
200-186= -16
4k
214-202= -12
4.5
221-220= -1
5k
215-218= +3
5.5k
204-211= +7
6k
175-198= +23
6.5
154-176= +22

Ave. loss= -11.5
Ave. gain= +13.75

~Dv8
so... if you were selling these cams and were making an ad for them.. i guess you can say that the cams add 26hp and 23tq.... :pimpgrin:
 
781 - 800 of 1,017 Posts